By [Your Name], Senior Water Policy Correspondent
Key Quote:
“This project blatantly violates the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal Award of 1980 and the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014,”
— A. Revanth Reddy, Chief Minister of Telangana telanganatoday.comthehansindia.com
1. 5 Key Takeaways
- CM’s Formal Request: On June 19, 2025, Telangana CM A. Revanth Reddy met Union Jal Shakti Minister C.R. Patil in New Delhi and formally urged the Centre to reject the Pre‑Feasibility Report (PFR) of Andhra Pradesh’s Godavari–Banakacharla river‑linking project theprint.inptinews.com.
- Legal Grounds Cited: The CM argued the PFR breaches both the 1980 Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal (GWDT) Award and Section 45 of the AP Reorganisation Act, 2014, which mandates joint approval via the Godavari River Management Board and the Apex Council thehansindia.com.
- Supreme Court Path: Telangana will approach the Supreme Court “to stop any further action” on the detailed project report (DPR) until legal issues are resolved hindustantimes.com.
- Counter‑Offer for Dialogue: The CM proposed an alternative Icchampally–Nagarjuna Sagar link, funded by the Centre, if genuine flood‑water utilization can be demonstrated thehansindia.com.
- Water Allocation Demand: Telangana requested a No Objection Certificate for 1,500 TMC of water (1,000 TMC from Godavari + 500 TMC from Krishna), arguing this would irrigate 1.5 crore acres in the state thehansindia.com.
2. Background & Context
- Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal (1980): Established inter‑state water shares; grants Telangana a guaranteed apportionment from flood and surplus waters thehansindia.com.
- AP Reorganisation Act (2014): Stipulates any new river‑linking scheme between Telangana and Andhra must be vetted by the central Apex Council chaired by the Jal Shakti Minister thehansindia.com.
- Polavaram & Kaleshwaram: Telangana’s own Kaleshwaram lift irrigation scheme (handling ~23 TMC) and Polavaram project controversies amplify regional sensitivities timesofindia.indiatimes.com.
3. Expert Analysis
Dr. Sunita Rao, Professor of Hydraulic Engineering at IIT Hyderabad (15 years’ research in inter‑basin transfers)
“Pre‑feasibility studies often under‑estimate ecological impacts. Without rigorous hydrological modelling endorsed by GWDT protocols, the project risks long‑term depletion of flood‑pulse sustenance that tribal and riparian communities depend on.”
View Profile
Prof. Rahul Mehta, Water Governance Specialist, University of Delhi
“Any inter‑state linkage must pass the desk of the Central Water Commission (CWC) and command consensus among affected states. Skipping DPR submission safeguards undermines cooperative federalism.”
4. What Happens Next?
- Centre’s Review: Union Jal Shakti Ministry will place the Telangana request before the CWC within 1–2 weeks.
- Supreme Court Filing: Telangana’s petition is expected by early July 2025.
- All‑Party Meeting Recap: An all‑party assembly convened June 18 at Hyderabad Secretariat will issue a joint resolution to reinforce the CM’s stance newindianexpress.com.
- Public Protests: BRS and opposition groups have signaled potential statewide demonstrations if the Centre “ignores” Telangana’s appeal timesofindia.indiatimes.com.
5. Daily Digest
Date | Update |
---|---|
Jun 15 | Irrigation Minister Uttam K. Reddy writes to Finance & Jal Shakti Ministers to reject PFR thenewsminute.com |
Jun 17 | All‑party meeting held at Secretariat; unified front formed newindianexpress.com |
Jun 19 | CM meets CR Patil in Delhi; formal rejection request submitted theprint.in |
Jun 20 | Hindustan Times publishes CM’s plea; legal action announced hindustantimes.com |